SCREEN-L Archives

June 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 10 Jun 1994 15:23:40 EDT
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Fri, 10 Jun 1994 10:09:09 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On Fri, 10 Jun 1994 10:09:09 -0500 Richard Leskosky said:
 
> What I can't understand is this.  Even if a
>producer starts with a bad script, there are enough hungry good writers out
>there so that a minimal additional investment could tighten it up, improve
>the language, make the story more coherent, etc. But nobody seems to do
>this.  (Conversely, there were over forty writers involved with THE
>FLINTSTONES, and look what happened there!)
>--Richard
>
 
A friend of mine with extensive contacts in the Hollywood industry but
is not directly obligated keeps telling me: "Don't ever assume the people
at studios know what they are doing."
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Cal Pryluck, Radio-Television-Film, Temple University, Philadelphia
<[log in to unmask]>  <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2