SCREEN-L Archives

February 1998, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
irene upshur or bill baratta <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 8 Feb 1998 15:28:12 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Nothing is more painful to anyone in the film industry than the sight of
 
decaying images--still or motion picture.
 
But can we in good conscience say that it is the "public's
responsibility"
to preserve these films?  Can't the public assume they are contributing
to
such efforts every time they buy a ticket to see a film?
 
Why can't the folks who earn huge sums from filmmaking stop coveting
their profit margins and start funding this effort? One would think
their emotional attachment alone would see them through parting with
such a relatively paltry sum.
 
Further, I worry that this film preservation effort is going to divert
money away from organizations, schools, artists who are involved in art
forms that are not as visible as film.
 
BOTTOM LINE:    Hey Scorcese...save a film...sell one of your villas.
 
Irene Upshur
 
----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/screensite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2