SCREEN-L Archives

February 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mark Bunster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Feb 1994 09:25:31 EST
In-Reply-To:
<no.id>; from "louis schwartz" at Feb 17, 94 11:32 pm
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
* Instead of thinking of the Huunter character a a person or as a metaphor
* for persons, why not think of her as an alegory for a certain cinema, that
* of image, music, and desire. A cinema which in the context of current
* films acts as an alternative to the masculinist, dialouge driven drivel that
* comes out of Hollywood?
 
I must say I've never seen the words "masculinist" and "dialogue driven" used
together to describe typical Hollywood fare...they seem at opposite poles,
don't you think? I would use the former to describe, say, Terminator, and the
latter for, uh, Beaches. Not much of the other in either film, really.
 
I think a film where Schwarzenegger plays a small child torn from his brother
by a cruel older woman who buys him from his mother, who makes him shave her
legs on the front porch and keeps his brother's letters from him, would be a
triumph for the industry.
 
:-)
 
--
Mark Bunster                      |I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
Survey Research Lab--VCU          |
Richmond, VA 23284                |
[log in to unmask]            |
(804) 367-8813/353-1731           |

ATOM RSS1 RSS2