LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UA.EDU
SCREEN-L
Film and TV Studies Discussion List
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCREEN-L Home SCREEN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Reply: Academy Ratio = 1.33, Not 1.66

Leo Enticknap <[log in to unmask]>
Sat, 17 Jun 2000 02:11:09 +0100
text/plain (31 lines)
Show HTML Part by Default | Print
Jeremy Butler's colleague writes:

>>Yes it is 1.33:1 and yes it is my Academy that it refers to.  AMPAS didn't
>>have anything to do with setting the standard (that was Edison), but, as
>>Katz writes about the Academy,  "... introduced the Academy mask in an
>>effort to re-establish screen rectangularity at the then-standard aspect
>>ratio of 1.33 : 1 (or 4 : 3).  The area delineated by the mask is known as
>>the Academy Aperture."

It wasn't even Edison - his assistant, W.K.L. Dickson, made the decision
that each frame of 35mm film should be four perforations tall and occupy
the entire width of the film from perf to perf, thus effectively
standardising the aspect ratio as roughly 1:1.33.

I wonder if he could have imagined just how big the consequences were of
what must, at the time, have seemed a relatively minor decision...

L
------------------------------------
Leo Enticknap
Technical Manager
City Screen Cinemas (York) Ltd..
13-17 Coney St., York YO1 9QL.
United Kingdom
Telephone: 01904 612940 (work); 01904 625823 (home); 07710 417383 (mobile)
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Header 1

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3