SCREEN-L Archives

June 1994


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Patrick B Bjork <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 8 Jun 1994 19:08:25 -0500
text/plain (23 lines)
> On to the question--one thing it tells us is that people will see almost
> anything.  _Maverick_ is a hit.  Even more depressing, however (since I
> enjoyed _Maverick_ but found it "disappointing" which means I hoped for
> more!) is the success of _The Flintstones_ which is a terrible movie!
> David Desser,UIUC Cinema Studies
I can imagine the British saying the same thing  about their 19th-century
theater so I'm not too sure how valuable a "people will see almost anything"
analysis might be. However, the success of _The Fugitive_ and _Maverick_ and
Flintstones_ and most of the other TV ripoffs might say something about
the state of the mainstream film industry. Perhaps they have
blockbustered themselves into a situation where, instead of choosing any
number of obscure scripts, studios/producers choose instead a presumeably
sure-fired hit that is guarenteed to strike a chord with movie-goers.
It's probably nothing new in Hollywood, just more manic and perhaps a
good deal more cynical than ever before.
BTW, without giving away too much of the plot, what is "terrible" about
_The Flintstones_?