On 2/27/96, Gene Stavis wrote: >Although she doesn't mention it, Sontag has identified one of the culprits in >another of her famous essays: camp. There is such reverence for films you can >feel comfortably superior to in today's students, precisely because film is >so powerful and seductive that many of today's students are terrified by it >and choose as their models the tame and harmless or the trivial and vacuous. I'm fascinated by Gene's statement that "many of today's students are terrified" by film (as opposed to individual films) and hope that he will consider elaborating on that in this forum. This poissibility had never really occurred to me before. Is there an obvious way to distinguish between this as the impulse behind the choice of "the tame and harmless or the trivial and vacuous" as models and mere ignorance or bad/undeveloped taste? --Richard J. Leskosky Richard J. Leskosky office phone: (217) 244-2704 Assistant Director FAX: (217) 244-2223 Unit for Cinema Studies University of Illinois ---- To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]