>Thanks, but maybe I should have been more specific. I've checked out >Schatz, Solomon, Kaminsky, but I find them all tautological. And Grant >and Altman and Neale, but they all tend to fall into the same traps. >Maybe I'm just getting last minute jitters abou this paper on film genre >theory (and have been readin too much Bordwell). > >arthur READING TOO MUCH BORDWELL!?!?!?! Is that possible? Also I thought Altman pretty much hit it on the head, but as always this is open to discussion... What do you mean that the above authors are too tautological/fall into traps? I must admit I do not understand.... LUKE __________________________________________________________________________ | | | Luke T. Delwiche internet: [log in to unmask] | | fax: (608)264-2200 | |__________________________________________________________________________|