On Fri, 21 Oct 1994, Murray Pomerance wrote: > I don't mean to be affronting here. But I really would like to hear > what you have to say about a film I know and care about (along with many > other people), like, for instance, Kane, before I commit to reading what > you have to say about Pulp Fiction. This is *not* because I'm > ostracizing Pulp Fiction. Indeed, I'm reserving judgment, a process made > exceptionally difficult by the kind of verbal meandering that's going on > on these screens. Wait a minute, Murrary--now really, who's doing the meandering here? It was you who name-dropped _Citizen Kane_, now it's *we* who have to discuss its merits before *you* will consider "commit[ting] to reading" about _Pulp Fiction_? Where's the logic--s'plain it to me please! Patrick Bjork Bismarck State College [log in to unmask]