Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:31:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I too was hoping that Cate Blanchett would win the Oscar for Best Actress.
I thought her performance in Elizabeth was far better than Gwyneth's in SIL.
I'm glad to learn that I am not alone in my opinion.
Gerry Herrera
Script and Screenwriting
Regent University
Virginia Beach, Virginia
P.S. I also enjoyed Cate's performance in Oscar and Lucinda.
At 10:27 AM 3/24/99 +1100, you wrote:
>Does anyone else think it's strange that Gwyneth Paltrow won the Best
>Actress Oscar over Cate Blanchett? I know Gwyneth is a popular choice but I
>don't think she's a very versatile or convincing actor, she was adequate
>for the part in SIL but it didn't seem to be a difficult or deep role.
>Cate's performance in Elizabeth was very convincing and I lost all
>awareness that it was a part she was playing. It makes me question the
>purpose of the award, I know it is driven by studio PR but I thought there
>was some pretence at giving it for the best performance in the films
>nominated.
>
>Kate Butler
>
>_____________________________________________________
>Kate Butler
>Department of Visual Communication
>RMIT University, Australia
>[log in to unmask]
>_____________________________________________________
> "If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure."
> -- Vice President Dan Quayle.
>
>----
>To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
>in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]
>
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama: http://www.tcf.ua.edu
|
|
|