SCREEN-L Archives

March 1996, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Sean Desilets <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Mar 1996 13:33:57 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<v0153050dad6be0f222f2@[193.61.20.1]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I find it pretty hard to distinguish "philosophy" from any nu,ber of
other disciplines, to teel you the truth, and that is even harder with
people who write about film. With that in mind I'd reccomend taking a
look at Savoj Zizek, who writes about (among other things) psychoanalysis
and film, particularly Hitchcock. He has a perspective which is certainly
informed by philosophy, although I don't think I'd refer to him (or
anyone) as a philosopher.
 
 
Sean Desilets
Tufts University
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2