SCREEN-L Archives

February 1996, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:19:40 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>
> I cannot believe the seriousness of now two posts concerning the spelling
> of one person's post.
 
Bravo!  I'm so glad someone finally came out and said this.  I found these
complaints even more scandalous than those messages a few weeks back
prescribing the "proper usage" of Screen-L, and bemoaning the substitition
of on-line information exchange for "good, old-fashioned books."
 
If we want to insist that interactions on Screen-L proceed according to
traditional academic conventions, let me suggest that--if only for the sake of
consistency--we save the fascistic pedantry for the graduate seminars,
and the bombastic viciousness for the faculty meetings.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2