SCREEN-L Archives

January 1996, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gene Stavis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Jan 1996 12:38:06 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
----------------------------- Begin Original Text
-----------------------------
 
In
this view, "Fatal Attraction" and "Basic Instinct" are as much entitled to be
called film noir as are films such as "The Postman Always Rings Twice"
(1946).
----------------------------- End Original Text -----------------------------
 
Which is an excellent reason for rejecting the definition.
 
True "film noir" was a phenomenon which existed in its purest form from about
1944 through about 1955. After that, "noirish" films became too
self-conscious to earn the term.
 
There were of course "pre-Noir" films and "post-Noir" films which exhibit
some of the characteristics of the genre. However, any definition must take
into account the societal and historical background which produced the
unaffected actual style. To consider "noir" one must factor in the atmosphere
of post-war* anxiety which is at the heart of the genre.
 
*(Don't quibble here. Despite "Double Indemnity" and "Murder My Sweet", the
great bulk of noirs came after the War.)
 
Gene Stavis, School of Visual Arts - NYC
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2