SCREEN-L Archives

September 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kirk W. Laughlin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Sep 1995 23:09:16 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
NOTE:  A "Usual Suspects" spoiler below:
 
DAVID MOON <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
>     and, although the name escapes me, the recent (last three years) film
>     with Liam Neeson playing a "set-up" man fighting for his life, after
>     his wife and an artist are found murdered in a Brighton hotel bedroom
>     is also a fine example of narration twisted to win the audience's
>     sympathies.
 
>     David Moon
 
Yes, I just watched that Liam Neeson film on cable (and the name
escapes me, too).
 
I don't think anyone has mentioned the new film "The Usual Suspects"
in which the entire plot, told in flashback, is called into question
by the narrator's unreliability -- there are even a few things like
"Reversal of Fortune" and "Rashomon" in which questionable events are
seen a couple of times with different details -- which makes you think
while you're watching it that you are getting close to the "truth" and
then the ENTIRE rug gets pulled out from under you.
 
I am partial to this type of film because I have written a "brilliant"
(of course) screenplay (a kind of cerebral "Total Recall") in which a
futuristic agent has his memories manipulated.
 
 
Kirk W. Laughlin
Grants Coordinator
Pacific Science Center
Seattle, WA
 
[log in to unmask]
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2