SCREEN-L Archives

September 1995, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pip Chodorov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Sep 1995 19:05:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Two short (maybe obvious) comments
 
>I had noticed how some trailers looked great, but this one really >appealed
to me.  It was beautifully shot
 
Trailers aren't shot, but are edited down from the feature. If you liked the
cinematography in a trailer, this is not a special property distinguishing
the trailer from the film. It means the film itself is shot well.
 
>ads are a great place to begin to admire film.  All in all, I think
>everyone should consider these ads to be mini-movies in themselves.
 
Ads have huge budgets - sometimes as big as feature films, and for only
thirty seconds. They can afford to look good. Hopefully anyway.
 
(Pip Chodorov)
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2