SCREEN-L Archives

September 1995, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gabriela Warkentin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 1995 19:45:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I have been following your discussion on the unreliable narrator. Actually,
I am at present studying the problem of the narrator in film. If you
consider for example The Age of Innocence, by Martin Scorsese, I think that
the narrator's voice may be too much at some times. Comparing it to the
novel, where the narrator has a very specific function, in the film it
seems, or at least to me, that the camera is by itself a very important and
"allmighty" narrator which makes the voice of the woman-narrator be a little
bit out of place and tone.
What happens with the narrator in film? Can we accept the camera as a
narrator? (in comparison to the narrator in literary works)I am thinking
particularly about those films, like The Age of Innocence, where you have a
narrator throughout the whole film.
I would appreciate any comments.
Gabriela Warkentin
[log in to unmask]
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2