SCREEN-L Archives

June 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Jun 1995 12:58:52 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
From: Tony Williams
English
SIUC
 Re, Mike Frank's point of June 28, 13.54 concerning the video projection
method. This may parallel the cinematic viewing situation assuming that
the projected video comes from a very good master copy. Otherwise, the
watching process is very difficult with explicit lines, fuzzy color, and
blurred images resulting in severe eyestrain. This effect is not just
confined to EP video versions. Some SP versions of Hitchcock's UNDER
CAPRICORN do not project very well. This problem may be eliminated if
the company concerned brings out digitally remastered images. But, in
most cases, it depends how good the actual video copy is in the first place.
The inferior ones would easily be seized upon by the traditionalists as
ammunition for the exclusive use of film.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2