SCREEN-L Archives

February 1995, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Donald Somer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Feb 1995 14:42:43 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
In response to Gene Stavis, and some of the other critics who have excoriated
the *American Cinema* series, although I agree with much of the criticism that
has been voiced on Screen-L thus far, many of the comments on the installments
of the series are more reflective of academic arrogance and nit-picking than
realistic criticism of a series geared as an INTRODUCTION to the topics
presented in each show. On that level, I find what I've seen of the series
informative and most applicable to introductory film history courses, or even
as introductions to genre courses. I believe some of us need to be reminded
that our expectations for the *American Cinema* series should not eclipse what
the filmmakers have set out to do:  Create a series interesting to mass tastes.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2