----------------------------Original message----------------------------

        On a practical level it seems that the use of surround sound

technologies is a means of enhancing the cinema experience in comparison

to television. I agree with Don Larsson's contention (if I am

interpreting it correctly) that it relates to the increase in sound which

surrounds our lives and the increasing spectacalization of stage (Cats,

Phantom of the Opera, Miss Saigon etc., ad nauseum) and other

entertainment forms.

        On a more theoretical level it would appear to adhere to notions

of suture. The surround sound pulls us in to the cinema experience (not

always successful as you have noted for shoebox style theatres) allowing

us to feel a part of what takes place on screen. The loud soundtracks of

action films, especially at times of heightened action, actually have a

bodily effect. The same is true to some degree in Higher Learning, where

the heavy bass sounds in the party scenes can be felt by the audience as

they would be by the characters on screen.

                                                Scott Henderson