SCREEN-L Archives

September 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denis Henry Hennelly <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Sep 1994 10:58:28 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
on tarantine:
regarding improvisation in reservoir dogs, i am not sure how safe it is
to assume that the film's verbal and acting strengths come solely
from improv.  taking true romance into consideration, i believe the
similarities in dialogue style, wording, pacing, etc. are very apparent
between it and reservoir dogs.  this is obviously a tarantino style,
not generated only because of a talented cast of actors.  secondly,
a director does not simply "let" his actors improv as he sits back
and relaxes.  directing improv, if it is to be good, is a very difficult
task, and one which deserves credit if it produces quality.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2