SCREEN-L Archives

September 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tony Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Sep 1994 11:36:10 CST
In-Reply-To:
note of 09/01/94 09:00
Comments:
Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
From: Tony Williams
English
SIUC
 tEND TO AGREE WITH YOU, JOHN. IT WAS DERIVATIVE, A VIRTUAL FEAST FOR
PASTICHE POSTMODERNIST GROUPIES. AS USUAL, OLIVER STONE BEGINS WITH AN
INTERESTING PREMISE, THEN GETS CARRIED AWAY WITH THE ROLLER COASTER
EMOTIONAL RIDE HE CREATES FOR HIS AUDIENCE.
DID ANYONE SEE ANY PARTICULAR CONNECTIONS BETWEEN HIS USE OF STOCK FOOTAGE
FROM HARDING-KERRIGAN, THE WILD BUNCH, AND NIGHT OF THE LEPUS, BEYOND THE
USUAL ANSWER OF "FREE PLAY OF SIGNIFICANTION" OR REFERENTS WITHOUT ANY
REALITY. IS THE FILM MORE THAN A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR FOUND FOOTAGE EPIC?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2