SCREEN-L Archives

June 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andi Oster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jun 1994 11:52:16 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Original Message(s):
>MESSAGE from [log in to unmask] 13-JUN-94 9:43
>From: "John G. Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 1994 20:06:06 -0700
>Reply-To: Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender: Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
>
> I'm very sorry that the message you read was posted on the list.
>I must have pushed the wrong button. It wasn't meant to be a whole list
>message since it wasn't mainly about film, etc. KEEP ME AWAY FROM THESE
>MACHINES!
>
> To answer your question...well I get the feeling there is an
>argument with no acceptable answer lurking in the shadows and I'd
>just as soon avoid it if you don't mind. All the best to you.
>
> Now, didn't Bernardo blow it with "Little Budda?" What a shame.
>Guess everyone's got a clunker somewhere. Understand there are three
>James Dean films in the works. Now, that is film stuff.
>____________________________________________________________________________
>
>---------------->from John G. Thomas ([log in to unmask]) <-------------------
>____________________________________________________________________________
>---
 
I'll tell you Bernardo's mistake in two words:
 
Keanu Reeves
 
The only thing I've enjoyed him in was Parenthood, and that's because he
was typecast.
 
Andi-O
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2