SCREEN-L Archives

February 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
meredith jacobson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Feb 1994 22:46:37 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
> In response to the statement about making lots of money.
> Who said a film needs to make lots of money to be a best film.  Lots of
> films make lots of money but they are horrible, i.e. Home Alone.  As far as
> I know, aside from Pretty Woman, most Best Picture Oscar nominees, are
> usually considered good by critics, at least most of them are, regardless
> of cash flow
 
And who considers the _critics_ "good"?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2