SCREEN-L Archives

February 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Michael Loter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Feb 1994 12:35:02 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
i am familiar with all of these strains.  by appealing to the net i am
merely suggesting we can discuss what procedures are involved in each of
the textual interpretations people have been offering.  it's not that i
don't know WHAT Barthes wrote or to what Gloria Monti was referring, it's just
that no-one has been able to convince me of the logical consistency of
these arguments. i hope we can discuss.....
 
jim
 
 
On Wed, 23 Feb 1994, DSK wrote:
 
> For a discussion of this theme see Roland Barthes's "The Death of the Author"
> in IMAGE MUSIC TEXT and Foucault's response "What is an Author?" in
> LANGUAGE, COUNTER-MEMORY, PRACTICE.  dsk
>
> That it is an inaccessible communication, to plunge into this contradiction
> is also a pleasure" (Thomas Mann, DOCTOR FAUSTUS).
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2