SCREEN-L Archives

November 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 12 Nov 1993 07:57:04 EDT
In-Reply-To:
Message of Wed, 10 Nov 1993 19:34:33 -0600 from <EVAN@UKANVAX>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Isn't some of this talk about silent movies just a little bit romanticized?
i mean we are talking about the technical limits of an industry, not actual
critical or aesthetic choices, otherwise the contemporary silent films would
not be as infrequent as they are. (Has there been a *commmercial* silent film
released since since Brooks did Silent Movie?) i've always been under the
impression that the presentation of silent movies usually included a musical
background of some kind, at least when silents are reissued they usually seem
to come complete with a brand new performance of music written especially for
the movie (Gance's Napoleon). i don't know, it just seems like we're confusing
watching 8mm home movies with Melies et al., and those memories of living room
ambience with Cagian satori. Which may not be a bad idea. -mike breiner

ATOM RSS1 RSS2