SCREEN-L Archives

November 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Harriet Margolis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Nov 1993 08:17:28 EST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Greg Smith and Dan Harries talk about parody, but I wonder if it might
not be appropriate to talk about irony.  That there's some mechanism
triggered by an aspect of style--whether visual, verbal, narrative, or
whatever--that leads us to recognize that things are not what they
seem.  So the 14-year-old unaware of Freud (an avatar of Bowie!!!) can
recognize that "something's going on" without knowing precisely what.
I don't mean to quibble about terms, but I think the mechanism operates
without the presence of parody also.
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2