SCREEN-L Archives

September 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Bunster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Sep 1993 13:31:47 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
* About Wilmington, North Carolina:  It started when when Dino DeLaurentis
* looked for a very cheap place to make films.  (North Carolina is a right
* to work state where exploitation of cheap labor is legal.)
 
Your bias is showing Cal!
Without engendering a non-topic discussion, some would consider compulsory
union membership as a condition to work equally exploitative, especially
given the uncertainty about just where one's union dues actually go.
 
Virginia also has right to work laws, which makes it another place Holloywood
seems to be turning to. There have been a number of films produced in
Richmond, Alexandria, and lots of places on the Eastern Shore very
recently--Kareem Abdul Jabbar's first directorial film(?!) being the latest.
Also, lots of prestigious actors (Redford, Spacek, et al) live in the horse
country of the northwest portion of the state--it's easy to have a film
appeal to you if you can go home at night.
 
 
 
* tried to produce films 'round and about the state.  Personally, I wouldn't
* plan to make a career in filmmaking in North Carolina unless I had a steady
* day job or spouse who had one.
Of course, this warning is even more applicable for NY and Hollywood.
 
 
--
Mark Bunster                      |Exchange conversation if you dare--
Survey Research Lab--VCU          |Share an empty thought or a laugh.
Richmond, VA 23220                |
[log in to unmask]            |
(804) 367-8813/353-1731           |                          -edFROM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2