SCREEN-L Archives

September 1992

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Matt McAllister" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Sep 1992 10:48:22 EDT
In-Reply-To:
Message of Thu, 17 Sep 1992 18:08:06 EDT from <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Another question/comment about colorization:
 
I always thought that copyright had a lot to do with Turner's
decision to colorize films.  He owns this huge film library,
and the copyright is about to expire for many of the older ones,
so copyrighting the colorized version (or, maybe too, the
"restored" version) is one way to maintain control.  Is
this not correct?
 
Matt McAllister
 
Virginia Tech

ATOM RSS1 RSS2