SCREEN-L Archives

March 1992

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Angela E Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Mar 1992 01:40:28 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
On Sat, 14 Mar 1992 11:11:25 EST Cal said:
 
>It's easy to blame the CIA for everything (one never loses betting with the
>probabilities) but I never heard that the USIA was anything more than what
>it claims to be: The United States Information Agency. They are the overseas
>(from us) agency responsible for dissemination of material relating to United
>States policy.
 
The truth in advertising about USIA's mission is analyzed an article in the
most recent issue of CovertAction Information Bulletin, Number 39 (Winter
1991-1992). The article is titled "USIA: Propaganda as Public Diplomacy"
by Robin Anderson who is listed as being a media critic living in New York
City.
 
The article's sole reference to the CIA is its inclusion as one of the
agencies involved in the "internal proganda apparatus" of USIA; related
to that mission, Anderson states that "a veteran CIA overseas propaganda
specialist [Walter Raymond]" headed the USIA's domestic strategy sessions,
I believe during the Reagan era.
 
The article deals mostly with the Carter and Reagan years (with the latter
having USIA more involved in disseminating particular angles on subjects).
Also talks about the blacklist that USIA maintained of Americans who un-
acceptable to represent the US including Cronkite, Coretta Scott King,
ABC's David Brinkley, the Washington Post's Ben Bradlee, and New Yrok
Times columnist Tom Wicker.
 
There are (were?) USIA regulations that USIA used to deny tax-exempt
status and thereby certification for duty-free export status to U.S.
films IT deemed propaganda. Until it was blocked by a federal appeals
court in 1988, the USIA had denied certification to anti-nuclear pwr
films (while certifying pro-nuclear films), a film depicting US urban
drug problems, a film about the dangers of uraniam mining, and another
film which the agency felt left the impression that the U.S. had
been the aggressor in the war against Nicaragua.
 
the article has citations (unlike many so much that is offered as news)
so you can fact check.
 
__________________________________________________________________
            º
 º=======º º "In a nut house the nominal is taken for the real,
 º º º assertions by the powerful are taken as true, and
 º=======º º the cynical manipulator thrives."
            º from the Doublespeak column in Z magazine 12/91
____________º_____________________________________________________
 
 Angela E. Taylor BITNET: EL406013@Brownvm
                     INTERNET: [log in to unmask]
__________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2