if the question is negative REVIEWS of hitchcock, they're all over the place . . . remember that VERTIGO was thoroughly lambasted when it first appeared

and there also is lots of stuff that admires hitchcock as a filmmaker but condemns some of the attitudes expressed in the films, not only the misogyny but -- to some -- a more general misanthropy as well

i take it that the interesting issue here is not his reputation or his misogyny but "negative views of him SPECIFICALLY as an auteur" . . . in other words some kind of response to robin wood's claim that we should take H seriously, that he is something like the 20th century's version of a shakespeare, some argument that he was just a facile but very efficient entertainer . . . surely there are some pieces that claim this but they've not been referenced yet

m

-----Original Message-----
From: Film and TV Studies Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ian Brookes
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 1:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SCREEN-L] Negative criticism on Alfred Hitchcock as an auteur

Another good place to look is Robert E Kapsis's Hitchcock: The Making of a Reputation. This is full of interesting instances of the shifts in Hitchcock's critical reputation. RK talks about a film like Torn Curtain, for example, which was quite poorly reviewed at the time because Hitch's reputation as a "master" of the espionage thriller (The Man Who Knew Too Much, The 39 Steps, North by North-West, etc) had become superseded with the advent of James Bond since 1960 and its impact on the genre. To many critics, Torn Curtain appeared outmoded in comparison. - Ian Brookes

________________________________________
From: Film and TV Studies Discussion List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of George Robinson [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 2:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SCREEN-L] Negative criticism on Alfred Hitchcock as an auteur

If you can find Raymond Durgnat's Hitchcock book, he has some
interesting and quirky things to say about the director, stuff that
would certainly leaven your thesis.

George Robinson

--
Man is the only [creature] that kills for fun;
he is the only one that kills in malice, the only
one that kills for revenge [. . .] He is the only
creature that has a nasty mind.

                                -- Mark Twain




On 10/30/2010 10:23 PM, Peter Longworth wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm an undergraduate student studying Cultural and Media Studies at
> the University of Newcastle, Australia. The reason I am writing is I
> have a major essay on Alfred Hitchcock as an auteur, and to make my
> essay more interesting I'd like to locate articles / books which
> criticise Hitchcock somewhat negatively. I've been directed to
> criticism from feminist scholars, but was wondering where else I
> should be looking, and if anyone could please recommend any articles
> where I may concentrate my study.
>
> Apart from the feminist angle, I know of a couple of articles written
> by Andrew Sarris who comments on Hitchcock's films not being taken
> seriously in the 1960s because they weren't considered serious films
> like what the European directors were making such as Antonioni and
> Bergmann.
>
> Other place I could go with my essay is for Hitchcock's use of
> violence in Frenzy - I actually find the strangle scenes today pretty
> disturbing, and I understand critical reception to the film's use of
> violence was mixed. I think Rope might have been criticised also from
> a moralistic point of view. There is also Hitchcock's attack on
> religion in his films, such as the Catholic church, in how he
> represents / shows nuns in Vertigo, which is the key film i'll be
> discussing in my paper.
>
> I hope someone might be able to recommend me to resources articles
> giving a negative criticism, or mixed criticism of Hitchcock, because
> mostly everyone says positive things about his films. I seek to make
> my essay a mixture of positive and negative criticisms.
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
> ----
> Learn to speak like a film/TV professor! Listen to the ScreenLex
> podcast:
> http://www.screenlex.org
>

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]