SCREEN-L Archives

October 2010, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:54:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
If you can find Raymond Durgnat's Hitchcock book, he has some 
interesting and quirky things to say about the director, stuff that 
would certainly leaven your thesis.

George Robinson

-- 
Man is the only [creature] that kills for fun;
he is the only one that kills in malice, the only
one that kills for revenge [. . .] He is the only
creature that has a nasty mind.

				-- Mark Twain




On 10/30/2010 10:23 PM, Peter Longworth wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm an undergraduate student studying Cultural and Media Studies at 
> the University of Newcastle, Australia. The reason I am writing is I 
> have a major essay on Alfred Hitchcock as an auteur, and to make my 
> essay more interesting I'd like to locate articles / books which 
> criticise Hitchcock somewhat negatively. I've been directed to 
> criticism from feminist scholars, but was wondering where else I 
> should be looking, and if anyone could please recommend any articles 
> where I may concentrate my study.
>
> Apart from the feminist angle, I know of a couple of articles written 
> by Andrew Sarris who comments on Hitchcock's films not being taken 
> seriously in the 1960s because they weren't considered serious films 
> like what the European directors were making such as Antonioni and 
> Bergmann.
>
> Other place I could go with my essay is for Hitchcock's use of 
> violence in Frenzy - I actually find the strangle scenes today pretty 
> disturbing, and I understand critical reception to the film's use of 
> violence was mixed. I think Rope might have been criticised also from 
> a moralistic point of view. There is also Hitchcock's attack on 
> religion in his films, such as the Catholic church, in how he 
> represents / shows nuns in Vertigo, which is the key film i'll be 
> discussing in my paper.
>
> I hope someone might be able to recommend me to resources articles 
> giving a negative criticism, or mixed criticism of Hitchcock, because 
> mostly everyone says positive things about his films. I seek to make 
> my essay a mixture of positive and negative criticisms.
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
> ----
> Learn to speak like a film/TV professor! Listen to the ScreenLex
> podcast:
> http://www.screenlex.org
>

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2