SCREEN-L Archives

October 2000, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:49:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
The print was courtesy of the great Mike Schlessinger of Columbia Classics
but alas there is no connection between what Mike does and the Video Dept.
Don't hold your breath for a restored version on VHS or DVD

Jessica Rosner
kino

> From: Scott Andrew Hutchins <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:06:41 -0500
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Night of the Demon recut
>
> I saw this film in the theatre on Saturday, and based on the IMDb
> showing certain scenes of the film were cut when it became _Curse of the
> Demon_ (which was the name on the marquee but not on the print), I know
> that I saw the uncut version, yet it is only the cut version that is
> available on video.  The print began with the Columbia Pictures 75th
> Anniversary logo (as did _Tommy_ when I saw it earlier this year, also
> in a theatre) and the print of the film itself said it was a Columbia
> Pictures presentation.  If Columbia Pictures is distrubuting the uncut
> version to theatres, why would they be distributing a truncated version
> on video?  Maybe someone who knows more about distribution than I has an
> answer for this.
>
> Scott
>
> ----
> For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
> http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html
>

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2