SCREEN-L Archives

October 2000, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Andrew Hutchins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:06:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I saw this film in the theatre on Saturday, and based on the IMDb
showing certain scenes of the film were cut when it became _Curse of the
Demon_ (which was the name on the marquee but not on the print), I know
that I saw the uncut version, yet it is only the cut version that is
available on video.  The print began with the Columbia Pictures 75th
Anniversary logo (as did _Tommy_ when I saw it earlier this year, also
in a theatre) and the print of the film itself said it was a Columbia
Pictures presentation.  If Columbia Pictures is distrubuting the uncut
version to theatres, why would they be distributing a truncated version
on video?  Maybe someone who knows more about distribution than I has an
answer for this.

Scott

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2